Who Do You Want in Charge of Beef Promotion? Good Question!

Please read and share your comments on this unedited 3rd Party Article  in response to this direct mail piece:


Who Do You Want in Charge of Beef Promotion?

Colorado Springs, CO March 28, 2011

Don’t forget our industry blog, Freemarketcarnivore. Our blog posts are not sent to you direct like the newsletter. But you can sign up on the blog to get an e-mail message sent to you when something new is posted.

A couple Novembers ago, a little while before Thanksgiving, a giant postcard fell out of my mail. On one side, a picture showed a family with their heads bowed around the Thanksgiving Day dinner table. The headline?

“Are they thankful for the food, or are they praying it won’t kill them?”

Yeah, my jaw dropped, too and I re-read that several times to make sure I had it right. Then I skimmed the rest to find out who had had the effrontery to insert something like that into the Catholic Herald. I should have known but I didn’t think even he would stoop that low to market beef. I was wrong.

This was Mike Callicrate’s beef marketing genius at work. Founding and active member of R-CALF and the Organization for Competitive Markets (OCM), Mike’s table tents on restaurants in town scream, “No Hormones, No Drugs” as the main selling proposition to diners. His theory is that only his beef is safe to eat – and the other 99 plus percentof beef found in American restaurants and supermarkets will make you sick or kill you. That’s why he made sure to bring kindred spirit Eric Schlosser to town for a book signing when his movie Fast Food Nationwas released, attacking mainstream meat production as hazardous to your health.

The handful of cattlemen to whom I’ve shown that postcard were outraged. I bring it up now because Callicrate has waded into the controversy over what kind of cattlemen should be in control of beef marketing through the national beef checkoff. Recently, his e-mail newsletter charged that one of the country’s leading state cattlemen’s organizations was guilty of grand larceny and, therefore, they were just like NCBA (“Wall Street on the Range,” Mike Callicrate, 03/26/11).

It’s kind of ironic, really. Callicrate cannot believe either NCBA’s policy division or Kansas Livestock Association’s (KLA) policy side can accomplish all they do on the dues money they receive from cattlemen. He believes the answer is that they have to be stealing money in order to be as good and effective as they are. And he really hates it that they are tooth and nail fighting the GIPSA Rule he thinks is the salvation of the meat industry and which the majority of cattlemen fear as the death knell for consistent, high quality, affordable beef.

What is his “evidence?” He provides a copy of part of a page of KLA’s tax return. It shows a revenue line listing checkoff funds. Another revenue line is dues income. Another sheet shows Dee Likes is CEO of KLA and treasurer of the Kansas Beef Council. >From that Callicrate concludes that KLA is “diverting the Kansas Beef Council (Beef Checkoff) dollars in much the same way NCBA reroutes the National Beef Checkoff funds – to their own bank accounts.” We see no evidence Callicrate has presented on which to base felony charges against either KLA or NCBA.

And, of course, there are other “one-hat” state cattlemen’s associations in which, because cattle numbers and revenue are too small to support separate staffs or the state’s cattlemen’s groups consolidated as much as possible years ago for efficiency and unification purposes, the state cattlemen’s association and state beef council share CEOs and staff. Is Callicrate implying that all one-hat associations are crooked?

Of course, Callicrate can’t resist adding his usual charge that mainstream cattle organizations like NCBA and KLA can’t really represent grassroots cattlemen because they don’t automatically oppose anything that comes out of the mouth of a packer/processor or retailer – those whomerchandise our product to consumers every day. Unless you sue packers, try to destroy beef programs or alliances in which cattlemen, packers and/or retailers cooperate (GIPSA Rule) or are not a small, independent cattlemen who agrees with Callicrate, then you are a lower form of planetary protoplasm.

To run with Callicrate and his separatist crowd, you MUST distrustnearly everyone else’s motives and integrity and believe that everyone must be set against one another in order to prevent cheating, collusion and coercion. Industries must be broken up into little separate segmentsand mom and pop companies, feedyards and ranches must be all independent of each other and trade groups must be separated by very small interest areas — and it’s best if nearly everyone everywhere hates each other so no one gets too cozy. In other words, efficiency, cooperation, leverage of capital and skill, economies of scale, competition to serve the customer – all the hallmarks of a growing, efficient free enterprise capitalist system must be foresworn to satisfy theparanoia of people like Callicrate and organizations like R-CALF and OCM.

Why do we not just ignore these charges as just the ravings of a radical, far out cattleman and purveyor of beef? Because while Callicrate’s charges are brash and apparently just baseless opinion, they are only by degrees wilder than the charges factions within the Cattlemen’s Beef Board have been making against NCBA for the last year. Callicrate’s charges bring to the fore a problem the industry needs to understand thoroughly and deal with right away to get our only national promotion, research and education organization back on track.

The bottom line is this: do you want people in charge of the beef industry’s marketing efforts like those who have reversed the 20-year declining trend through CBB’s past leadership and the contract work of NCBA, USMEF, ANCW and others? Or do you want people and organizations in lock step with Callicrate’s marketing theory ofdestroying consumer confidence in beef and attacking packers, retailers and foodservice operators instead of working with them to process and merchandise beef? Anyone out there want the checkoff to work with Eric Schlosser of Fast Food Nation and Food Inc. andMichael Pollan of “Omnivore’s Dilemma” to promote our beef?

Look for a Special Investigative Report from AFF closely examining and exposing this situation very soon.

On the blog today:

1) See the post card Mike Callicrate sent all good Catholics in Colorado Springs diocese.

2. Read about the major Senate EPA vote any day now and what you can do to help.

Click here for freemarketcarnivore

Click to go to AFF Facebook page. You’ll need to log in or Register (it’s free) to see the page.

Past issues of the Sentinel are available on our website at www.agribusinessfreedom.org

Help Us Expose Hidden Motivations & Real Agendas

Invest in Your Future.

We are engaged in national efforts that could shape the future of livestock and meat marketing, industry structure and world trade for decades. Animal welfare activists like the Humane Society of the U.S. are engaged in an aggressive campaign to change the way production livestock are raised, housed, doctored and slaughtered. Please join with us and help make sure AFF’s independent voice of reason is out there.

If the 2006 elections made the road more challenging, the 2008 elections doubled the difficulties. NOV. 2 revealed that livestock producers, feeders and the meat production chain are not the only Americans sick of government spending, regulation and interference. Many taxpayer/voters believe in limited government and we must reach out to them to help us reclaim America from the federal government. Please help us preserve your freedom to innovate and adapt to the 21st century consumer.

We need your check today or your visit to our website, where you can use a credit card to make your contribution.

Posted in General Advocacy | 14 Comments

What? Whose “Beef Checkoff” is it anyway?

The phone number for Secretary Vilsack is (202) 720-3631

The attached financial document and notes are from the year-end Kansas Livestock Association (KLA) Executive Committee meeting, held on February 16th, 2011.

Income line items for Educational Seminars, Kansas Beef Council Rent (collects the mandatory $1 per head checkoff in Kansas), and Kansas Beef Council services amount to over $329,000 for 2010. According to the financials, the KLA Stockman magazine contributes over $250,000 to KLA’s bottom line. How much of this income comes from the fancy ads they run in the magazine marketing the beef checkoff program to cattle producers (preaching to the choir) who are all forced to pay by government mandate? This full color, slick page magazine, while trying to convince cattle producers to support the beef checkoff, is also a recruiting tool for new KLA and National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) members. Only a careful audit would reveal how much of KLA’s income is derived from the Kansas Beef Council which shares office space with KLA. The amount could be substantial.

It appears from the notes that the KLA allocated $130,000 of a $3.5 million budget to fight the proposed GIPSA rules (desperately needed by independent cattle producers to restore fair, open and competitive markets). Comparatively, the Kansas Cattlemen’s Association, which actually represents the interests of cattle producers, has a budget of approximately $200,000 per year.

The Secretary of Agriculture can separate the KLA from our money right now. The Secretary can stop the practice of appointing the “friends” of KLA, NCBA and members of other big feeder/big packer policy groups to the state beef councils, which then funnel enormous sums of money to themselves to lobby against us. He can require democratically elected boards of all cattlemen, like in Nebraska. Give Secretary Vilsack a call at (202) 720-3631. Ask him to stop the practice of funding political policy organizations with our money and instead focus our beef checkoff investment on producing better beef and promoting it.

KLA Income Statement and GIPSA Notes 2-16-11

Listen to Mike Callicrate, from the DerryBrownfield.com Show, expose and discuss the tragedy of the “Beef Checkoff”  (podcast)

Mike Callicrate
St. Francis, KS 67756
785-332-8218

Posted in General Advocacy | Leave a comment

Commonsense Coalition Radio – March 21, 2011

Monday • Mar 21, 2011
Commonsense Coalition Talk Radio Presents
Mike Callicrate • Beef Industry l Beef Check Off

[audio:http://www.commonsensecoalitiontalkradio.com/tracks/032111.mp3]
Posted in CSC Talk Radio | Leave a comment

Our cheap food comes at a high price

Mike CallicrateWe have the food system we asked for. There’s a reason a burger at McDonald’s sells for about a buck. There’s a reason the food is of such poor quality in places where healthy nutrition is most important — our schools, hospitals and nursing homes.

What we support prospers; what we feed grows. If we support Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart will prosper. If we demand $1 burgers at McDonald’s and insist that surplus food donated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture be served in our schools, then the worn-out-cow meat business based on imports and crowded feedlots will grow.

When we demand cheap food, should we be surprised when our food is cheap? Not so long ago, close-to-death “downer” cows were ground into our food supply, and we are still getting exactly what we ask for — stuff that hardly resembles food; garbage that, if tested, would often qualify as inedible and dangerous waste. This gutfill is so low in nutritional value and so high in unhealthy chemicals — and has been consumed by us for so long — that we are suffering from unprecedented levels of degenerative diseases and health-care costs.

Food produced on a factory scale for a mass market has steadily driven out local farmers and livestock producers, bakers, butchers and corner food stores. Yet we often seem surprised by some of the consequences of factory-food production. Perhaps you were taken aback when you learned not long ago that one beef-slaughtering plant could kill or paralyze people just by taking the meat from hundreds of cows, mixing it with fat and turning it all into burgers. Just a few years ago, you might have been surprised to learn that one spinach producer in California could sicken people in 26 states.

At the request of the big food companies, we have given mass producers much too much latitude to keep our food clean and safe. Federal inspection personnel have been reduced to paper-shufflers. Even worse, they have been spread so thin that they seldom inspect our meat-processing facilities. Do we really expect companies pressured by demands for unreasonable profits not to cut corners? Most companies don’t tell their employees to cut corners; they simply demand that the workers make things happen fast — or else. And that is why vigilant oversight is so necessary.

For too long, we have looked the other way, refusing to think about exactly how — and why — it is that things can be so cheaply produced. If we could somehow feel and experience the human, animal and environmental suffering that goes into our demand for cheapness, maybe we would act differently.

Worn-out dairy cows are found everywhere, the last precious drop of milk having been squeezed out of them. The market power of the large milk processors is driving dairies to extremes to survive. Highly stressed processing workers, lacking a living wage and essential health care, are treated like the animals in our industrial food system. They are continually asked to do more for less, and they are at their physical and mental limits. Some of them are severely abused and mistreated, and when they are used up, they, too, are discarded.

Even though what we eat is crucial for our health, we have become proud of finding the cheapest prices for everything. We are hypocrites: We celebrate the $1 price tag and then worry about our children’s obesity, our high blood pressure, diabetes and heart disease.

We have seen what our appetite for foreign oil has produced — a dangerous dependency. Food is no different. From farmers and ranchers to packers and processors, the infrastructure for food production in this country has begun to collapse. We are now a net importer of food; 20 percent of the beef we consume, for example, is imported. Foreign companies are now buying our biggest food processors at deeply discounted prices.

Wouldn’t our country be better served if we produced and processed almost all of our own food at home?

If we want a healthy, safe and dependable food system in this country, we need to demand it — and support it. When we buy from farmers, butchers and bakers in our own neighborhoods and counties, we buy and consume food that tastes good, strengthens our local economies and is nutritionally satisfying. Best of all, when our food is local, we always have the option of stopping by to see for ourselves exactly how the animals and gardens are growing.

Mike Callicrate is a contributor to Writers on the Range, a service of High Country News in Paonia, Colorado (hcn.org). He is a rancher in Kansas and runs ranchfoodsdirect.com in Colorado Springs, Colorado.

Republished from http://www.hcn.org/wotr/our-cheap-food-comes-at-a-high-price

Posted in General Advocacy | Tagged | 1 Comment

Justice for all? Not in this court!

 

Clarence and Virginia Thomas share a good laugh with attendees at a Utah Supreme Court swearing-in ceremony, 07/19/10. (photo: AP)

Clarence Thomas’ Dangerous Conceit

By Jonathan Turley, Los Angeles Times

06 March 11 

The Supreme Court justice argues that criticism of him is an attack on the court itself. But a single justice doesn’t define the institution. 

Callicrate note:

Thomas is the Supreme Court Justice, formerly employed by Monsanto, who wrote the court’s opinion approving the patenting of life. Thomas also thought the Anna Nicole Smith family feud case was more important than hearing the cattlemen’s case for fair markets and later denied the A.T. Terry case a hearing. He also agrees that corporations should be able to contribute any amount of money to political campaigns. Somewhere, perhaps it was at one of the Koch brothers judicial retreats, Thomas forgot the American concept of “justice for all”.

Posted in General Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment